India's Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) has exposed a major oversight by state-owned Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited (BSNL), which neglected to bill Reliance Jio Infocomm Ltd (RJIL) for sharing its passive telecom infrastructure for a decade. The CAG report reveals that BSNL's failure to enforce the Master Service Agreement (MSA) between May 2014 and March 2024 resulted in a direct loss of ₹1,757.76 crore to the national exchequer.
This significant financial hit includes accumulated penalties and interest stemming from BSNL's delayed or non-existent invoicing for RJIL's expanded technological utilization of its infrastructure. Additionally, the report points out that BSNL's omission in applying the MSA's price escalation clause led to a further revenue shortfall of ₹29 crore, inclusive of Goods and Services Tax (GST). The passive infrastructure in question encompasses shared assets like telecom towers, power supply units, shelters, and cooling systems.
The CAG's findings underscore deep-rooted systemic weaknesses within BSNL concerning contract management, financial responsibility, and internal oversight mechanisms. This negligence by a public sector undertaking directly affects taxpayer money and erodes public confidence in the ability of government-run entities to effectively manage collaborations with private sector players. The lack of MSA enforcement and the overlooked escalation clauses highlight a lack of due diligence and raise serious questions about the supervisory roles within BSNL during this extensive period.
This revelation has reignited discussions surrounding potential preferential treatment and distortions within the telecom market. Critics have drawn connections between BSNL's ongoing financial difficulties and Jio's rapid market dominance since 2016, suggesting a possible indirect subsidization of the latter's growth through a decade of unbilled infrastructure usage. The issue has also triggered strong reactions on social media, with users expressing criticism and satire directed at BSNL's oversight and alleging potential deliberate negligence and cronyism.
The CAG report emphasizes the critical need for:
Strengthened governance frameworks within Public Sector Undertakings (PSUs).
Implementation of automated billing and auditing systems for contracts involving private companies.
Regular internal and external audits to proactively prevent such significant lapses.
Consideration of penal recovery from RJIL, alongside internal disciplinary measures within BSNL.
Furthermore, the incident brings to the forefront the crucial aspect of political accountability when such large-scale oversights impact national revenue. The BSNL-Reliance Jio billing lapse is not merely a financial error; it represents a broader issue concerning accountability, systemic inefficiencies, and potential favoritism in public-private partnerships within India's telecom and governance sectors. As the CAG's report gains wider circulation, public scrutiny, political pressure, and potential institutional reforms will determine whether this incident is treated as an isolated mistake or recognized as a symptom of more profound underlying problems within India's telecom and governance landscape.